Sensuous entanglements: a critique of cockfighting conceived as a “cultural text”
Read the article here.
Based on yearlong ethnographic fieldwork in rural South Punjab, this paper argues that in order to understand the multiple modalities of human-rooster relationship, our analysis should delve beneath the visual spectacle and engage with local ways of sensing and understandings of the practice. It contends that a multisensory analysis of cockfighting that focuses on the interplay of different senses – including the sound of roosters, the smell of their bodies, their preference in taste, texture of their plumage and muscles, and the sight of their fight – can help critique and refigure Clifford Geertz’s interpretation of cockfighting as a “cultural text.”
Key Questions
How can care and cruelty, intimacy and indifference, passion and combat, and attachment and detachment coexist in interspecies relations?A
How can we develop a deeper understanding of more-than-human relatedness through the study of this nexus?
How can an understanding of cockfighting as an expression of intimacy lead us to redefine crucial cultural themes such as “masculinity” and “honor” in a rural Pakistani setting?
Inspirational Texts
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Stoller, Paul. 1997. Sensuous Scholarship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Inspirational Quotes:
“A man who has a passion for cocks, an enthusiast in the literal sense of the term, can spend most of his life with them, and even those, the overwhelming majority, whose passion though intense has not entirely run away with them, can and do spend what seems not only to an outsider, but also to themselves, an inordinate amount of time with them. ‘I am cock crazy,’ my landlord, a quite ordinary afficionado by Balinese standards, used to moan as he went to move another cage, give another bath, or conduct another feeding. ‘We’re all cock crazy’ ”